Published July 19, 2026 at 3:08 PM ET · Updated July 19, 2026 at 5:08 PM ET
Homan warns ICE surge coming to New York as Mamdani touts sanctuary status
1 independent outlets are covering this story. Verification: Watching — single-source — not yet independently corroborated. Patriot Watch links to original reporting; we don't republish it.
Tom Homan warned that an ICE surge is coming to New York. This comes as Mamdani touts sanctuary status.
Patriot Watch first flagged this story 21 hr ago, when Fox News - Latest reported it. So far this remains a single-source report. The most recent report came 21 hr ago from Fox News - Latest. Verification tier: Watching — single-source — not yet independently corroborated.
⚖ The Constitutional Angle
Printz v. United States held the federal government may not compel state or local executive officers to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program, extending anti-commandeering to local officials. Murphy v. NCAA added that this bars federal prohibitions on state lawmaking too. New York may therefore decline to assist ICE without being commandeered into federal enforcement.
Printz v. United States 521 U.S. 898 (1997)
Vote: 5-4 · Opinion: Scalia
The federal government may not compel state or local executive officers to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. The Brady Act's interim command that county sheriffs (CLEOs) conduct background checks on handgun purchasers — and the companion duty to accept Brady Forms from dealers — is unconstitutional, extending New York's anti-commandeering rule from state legislatures to state executive officers. Congress cannot circumvent the prohibition by conscripting the states' officers directly, regardless of how minimal the burden or how important the federal policy.
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association 584 U.S. 453 (2018); 138 S. Ct. 1461
Vote: 6-3 on the judgment (7-2 that PASPA's anti-authorization provision is unconstitutional;… · Opinion: Alito
PASPA's provision barring states from 'authorizing' sports gambling violates the anti-commandeering rule, and the licensing bar falls with it; no remaining PASPA provision is severable, so the entire statute fell. Critically for sanctuary law, the Court held there is 'no meaningful difference' between Congress commanding a state legislature to enact a law and prohibiting it from enacting one — anti-commandeering covers federal prohibitions on state lawmaking, not just affirmative orders.
Precedent facts from the PW Law Library — primary-source verified & independently audited
