Patriot Watch
We watch. You know first.
Watching Border
By the Patriot Watch Desk
Published July 22, 2026 at 2:12 PM ET · Updated July 23, 2026 at 12:55 AM ET

Texas targets birth tourism industry with new executive order

1 independent outlets are covering this story. Verification: Watching — single-source — not yet independently corroborated. Patriot Watch links to original reporting; we don't republish it.

Read the story at WND →

What we know

Texas has issued a new executive order targeting the birth tourism industry. The order aims to address the practice of birth tourism within the state.

Patriot Watch first flagged this story 13 hr ago, when WND reported it. So far this remains a single-source report. The most recent report came 13 hr ago from WND. Verification tier: Watching — single-source — not yet independently corroborated.

⚖ The Constitutional Angle

United States v. Wong Kim Ark held that a child born on U.S. soil to foreign nationals domiciled here is a citizen at birth. Trump v. Barbara extended that to children of parents lawfully but only temporarily present, because they remain subject to U.S. law. Birth on American soil still confers citizenship regardless of parents' status, so Texas cannot undo that by executive order.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
Vote: 6-2 (Justice McKenna took no part) · Opinion: Justice Horace Gray
A child born in the United States to parents of Chinese descent who, at the time of his birth, were subjects of the Emperor of China but had a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, were carrying on business here, and were not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the Chinese government, becomes at birth a citizen of the United States under the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Trump v. Barbara 609 U.S. ___ (2026) (slip opinion; U.S. Reports page not yet assigned)
Vote: 6-3 on invalidity of EO 14160; 5-4 on the Fourteenth Amendment ground · Opinion: Chief Justice John Roberts
Children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully present or lawfully but temporarily present are born 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Citizenship Clause. Executive Order 14160 is invalid. Roberts's opinion treated 'jurisdiction' as satisfied by amenability to U.S. law, reaffirmed Wong Kim Ark as declaratory of the common-law rule inherited from Calvin's Case, and grounded the Clause in the repudiation of Dred Scott.
Precedent facts from the PW Law Library — primary-source verified & independently audited

Conservative & independent coverage (1)

WND 13 hr ago
Texas targets birth tourism industry with new executive order
More on: ImmigrationBorder Crisis
Sponsored
Brownells.com

More Border coverage

Fifth Circuit says illegal immigrants have no broad right to avoid detention during removal
Border · 2 outlets · 1 hr ago
Rep. Brandon Gill introduces bill to limit birthright citizenship
Border · 1 outlets · 4 hr ago
Fifth Circuit sides with Trump administration on detaining illegal immigrants during removal
Border · 1 outlets · 5 hr ago
Illegal immigrant once released under Obama faces charges in a North Carolina hit-and-run that killed three
Border · 2 outlets · 7 hr ago
Fifth Circuit sides with Trump administration on detaining illegal immigrants during removal
Border · 2 outlets · 9 hr ago
Republican lawmakers introduce bill to close birthright citizenship loophole
Border · 1 outlets · 10 hr ago
The Patriot Watch Daily Brief

Every morning. The stories that matter, first — straight to your inbox. Free.

© 2026 Patriot Watch · Every headline links to the original reporting