Published August 14, 2026 at 12:00 AM ET · Updated August 14, 2026 at 10:11 PM ET
Justice Department reportedly backs challenge to National Firearms Act
2 independent outlets are covering this story, first reported here by American Thinker. Verification: Corroborated (how we verify). Every headline links to the original reporting.
The Justice Department under President Trump will reportedly support ending the National Firearms Act after 92 years. Reports indicate the DOJ is backing a challenge to the law.
Patriot Watch first flagged this story 1 d ago, when American Thinker reported it. Coverage has since grown to 2 independent outlets. The most recent report came 2 hr ago from ZeroHedge.
⚖ The Constitutional Angle
Bruen held that when the Second Amendment's plain text covers conduct, the government must justify the regulation with the Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. Heller recognized an individual right to keep arms but said longstanding prohibitions remain presumptively lawful. Whether the National Firearms Act is such a longstanding rule or must pass Bruen's history test is unsettled here.
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Kevin P. Bruen, Superintendent of New York State Police 597 U.S. 1 (2022)
Vote: 6-3 · Opinion: Thomas
New York's requirement that applicants demonstrate 'proper cause' — a special need for self-protection distinguishable from the general community — to obtain an unrestricted public-carry license violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public. The Court held the Second Amendment protects a right to carry handguns publicly for self-defense, and rejected the two-step means-end framework lower courts had applied after Heller.
District of Columbia v. Heller 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
Vote: 5-4 · Opinion: Scalia
The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use it for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home. The right is not unlimited: the Court noted that longstanding prohibitions (e.g., possession by felons and the mentally ill, carrying in sensitive places, conditions on commercial sale) remain presumptively lawful. D.C.'s ban on handgun possession in the home and its requirement that lawful firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional violate the Second Amendment.
Precedent facts from the PW Law Library — primary-source verified & independently audited
